Thinking Allowed
medical / technology / education / art / flub
Open peer review could result in better quality of peer review: Whether or not a research article has been peer reviewed
Open peer review could result in better quality of peer review: Whether or not a research article has been peer reviewed openly can seemingly make a difference to the quality of the peer review, according to research carried out by BioMed Central's Research Integrity Group and Frank Dudbridge from the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine. When two similar journals were compared, articles that underwent an open peer review showed a 5% improvement in the quality of the peer review reports compared to those that underwent a single blind peer review.
Source: medicalxpress.com
peer review underwent quality research compared open biomed
- Interview: The BMJ's Patient Review Initiative - A Novel Expansion...
- Some science journals that claim to peer review papers do not...
- Guest Post - A Model for Peer-to-Peer Workplace Learning - The...
- Why are peer reviews private?: That is a question raised by...
- Multi-social millennials more likely depressed than social(media)ly...
RSS feed